THE ISSUES The freeway is generally conceived of and used as a solution for an engineering problem: moving objects from point A to point B. The freeway exists inside the cities but its territory is part of another sphere that does not belong to the cities or their citizens. It does not interact with the public sphere or the urban sphere. The freeway is the Forbidden City. Its territory is erased from cities’ maps. Its signs do not allow humans to enter its domain.
At the same time, as a contradiction, we require more and more of freeways. We as a race of humans spend more and more time in its domain. The freeway has transformed our perception of distance, our perception of proximity; it has allowed cities’ territories to expand exponentially in the last century. While this expansion is taking place, the separation between city and freeway is also becoming more accentuated.
This separation has given special freedom to the realm of the cars to develop their own set of rules. This autistic behavior that now creates this new context in the one-velocity- and not-now-place is the ruling directive. A space, a place where what is not moving is dangerous. The freeways have facilitated the hyperextension of the boundary of the city and the connections to other cities throughout the country. While this has enabled an unprecedented ease of mobility through and between cities, these same freeways have alienated the interactions and relationships between the cities’ inhabitants.
THE STUDIO explores the aesthetic of the movement of vectors in the space of the freeway and seeks ways to interweave this aesthetic with the intrinsic humanity of the city. Specifically, this project relates the space of the freeway with the activity of the human inhabitants of the city. We will explore the social and spatial conditions of architecture that moves and the objects and ideas that move through architecture. Specifically we will explore ways that mobility dehumanizes architecture and the city. We will challenge this and find new ways that architecture and mobility can interact in a humane way. We will focus on the dichotomy between the need for transportation inside the cities and what transportation systems do to the cities and their inhabitants. The objective of this course is to give a new perspective on the cultural impact of infrastructural projects that moves beyond reducing freeways to engineering solutions to traffic problems to also consider the freeway’s dangerous ability as a tool of social control.
THE FINAL PROJECT will study the future City of Raleigh Freeway Project (I-540) as designed on paper and dissect its physical, political and cultural dimensions and potential consequences. From here, we will propose a new hybrid of roadway that is not only about physical movement but also about integration in a way that does not obliterate but instead engages with the complexities of community lives. We will move through four lines of research simultaneously during the semester.
Our territory: the RDU freeway project to study the implications of the existing territory & explore possibilities of the new topography that will be generated after the freeway is concluded.
Actors: the complexities of public and private, small and big scale, from examples of similar projects in history, including: Haussmann in Paris, the linear city of Arturo Soria y Mata, Pope Sixtus in Rome, La Ronda de Dalt in Barcelona and The lille of Koolhaas.
The car: Fluxus and the poetic of movement
The urban project: the architectural project as a negotiator of scales, programs, speeds, public and private, city and region.
Each student will do an exercise that explores each one of these four lines of research, culminating in the Final Project.
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE
COLLEGE OF DESIGN
NC STATE UNIVERSITY
ARC 402 SPRING 2008
Jota Samper